تحلیل فضاهای عمومی شهری با رویکرد شهر دوستدار سالمند(مورد پژوهشی منطقه 3 شهر اصفهان )

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری ، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه جغرافیا و گردشگری دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران

10.22034/grd.2026.24409.1691

چکیده

با افزایش جمعیت سالمندان، ضرورت بازنگری در طراحی فضاهای شهری به منظور ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی بیش از پیش احساس می شود. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل فضاهای عمومی شهری با رویکرد شهر دوستدار سالمند در منطقه 3 شهر اصفهان انجام شده است.پژوهش از حیث هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش انجام، توصیفی- تحلیلی می‌باشد. ابزار گردآوری داده ها مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی است. جامعه آماری را سالمندان بالای65 سال منطقه 3 تشکیل داده‌اند و بر اساس فرمول کوکران 400 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه به صورت تصادفی ساده انتخاب شده‌اند. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با نرم افزار spss و Amos و با استفاده از آزمون های آماری مانند T تک نمونه ای، همبستگی پیرسون و مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد.یافته های پژوهش نشان داد که مؤلفه ی فضای باز و ساختمان ها با میانگین 2.56، مولفه ی حمل و نقل با میانگین 2.47، مولفه ی مشارکت اجتماعی با میانگین 2.07 و مؤلفه ی تفریحی و فرهنگی با میانگین 1.73 در وضعیت مطلوبی قرار ندارند. هم چنین بر اساس یافته های حاصل از تحلیل مدل ساختاری، مؤلفه فضای باز و ساختمان ها با بار عاملی 0.96 و مؤلفه تفریحی - فرهنگی با وزن عاملی 0.83 در رتبه دوم اهمیت قرار گرفته است.نتایج حاصل از اعتبار سنجی یافته ها بیان کننده این است که بهبود وضعیت فضاهای عمومی شهر دوستدار سالمند در منطقه 3 نیازمند شناخت تعاملات بین جمعیت سالمند و تحولات محیط شهری در طراحی و اجرای سیاست های عمومی کارآمد در حوزه کاری مدیران و برنامه یزان شهری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of urban public spaces with an age-friendly city approach (case study of District 3 of Isfahan city)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayh gorjali 1
  • aboozar vafaei 2
1 Master of Geography and Urban Planning, Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Tourism, university of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction

Isfahan province is among the provinces that have a high percentage of the elderly population, such that according to the data from the Statistical Center of Iran in 2022, this province, with 12.9%, ranked fourth nationally in terms of the elderly percentage, after the provinces of Gilan, Mazandaran, and Tehran. On the other hand, regarding the distribution of the elderly population in the province, it is observed that the metropolis of Isfahan, with a population of 1,961,260 (Statistical Center of Iran, 2016), comprises a significant portion of the elderly population. Region 3, as one of the main and central areas of the city of Isfahan, has a considerable share of the city’s tourist attractions, government centers, service providers, and economic activities. It is one of the regions with a high percentage of elderly population, having 12,656 elderly individuals, making it one of the top three regions in terms of the number of seniors over 65 years old among all areas of Isfahan. Since the demographic trend in this area is moving towards aging, and this segment of society, due to their retirement, has a greater need to engage with urban spaces and requires a higher quality of public urban environment, this research aims to address the following question while presenting relevant theoretical concepts: How is the condition of public spaces in Region 3 of Isfahan city concerning the elements of an age-friendly city? Additionally, effective strategies will be proposed for adapting urban spaces to be more friendly for the elderly in Region 3 of Isfahan city.

Research Methodology

This research is classified as applied in terms of its objective and descriptive-analytical in terms of its nature and methodology. Theoretical aspects were investigated through library studies, while field data were collected via questionnaires, direct observation, and interviews. The statistical population comprises 12,656 elderly individuals aged 65 and above residing in Region 3 of Isfahan. A sample size of 400 individuals was selected using simple random sampling. The collected data were subjected to both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. Specifically, the components of urban space suitability for an elderly-friendly city in Region 3 of Isfahan, along with the influencing factors as perceived by the elderly residents, were assessed and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, corresponding to the measurement level of the data and the study's hypotheses. The statistical software utilized for data analysis and map visualization includes SPSS and ArcGIS.

Results and discussion

With the significant increase in the elderly population in recent decades, addressing the specific needs of this demographic group in urban design and planning has become an undeniable imperative. Urban space serves not only as a platform for daily movement and activities but also plays a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of life, mental well-being, and social participation of seniors. In this context, adapting the physical, functional, and social components of urban spaces with a comprehensive and human-centered approach can pave the way for creating environments that are safe, accessible, and responsive to the physical and psychological needs of the elderly. This research, by focusing on analyzing the current status and identifying challenges and opportunities, endeavors to provide a scientific framework for improving the quality of urban spaces in Isfahan's Region 3 to achieve an age-friendly city. The research findings indicated that the "Open Space and Buildings" component, with a mean score of 2.56, the "Transportation" component with a mean of 2.47, the "Social Participation" component with a mean of 2.07, and the "Recreational and Cultural" component with a mean of 1.73, are not in an optimal state. Furthermore, based on the findings from the structural model analysis, the "Open Space and Buildings" component, with a factor loading of 0.96, and the " Recreational-cultural " component, with a factor weight of 0.83, were ranked second in terms of importance.

Conclusion

The results of the research regarding the evaluation of components for adapting urban spaces to be elderly-friendly in Region 3 of Isfahan indicate that four main components—open spaces and buildings, transportation, social participation, and recreational-cultural services—are all in an undesirable state and are rated below the theoretical average level. The results of the one-sample t-test, with a very low significance level (Sig = 0.000) for most items, reveal a statistically significant difference between the current situation and the desired condition. Specifically, in the area of open spaces and buildings, there are noticeable deficiencies in accessibility, safety, and basic facilities such as restrooms, appropriate seating, and wheelchair pathways. The transportation component reflects the general dissatisfaction among seniors regarding urban transportation services and the misalignment of infrastructure with their mobility needs. In terms of social participation, elderly individuals face structural and social limitations that hinder their active presence and social interaction in public spaces. The recreational-cultural component indicates a lack of appropriate educational, recreational, and cultural programs for seniors, as well as a serious deficiency in related infrastructure. Therefore, these results clearly indicate that Region 3 of Isfahan faces significant challenges on the path toward becoming an age-friendly city. Consequently, a reevaluation of urban policies, comprehensive design of public spaces, and the enhancement of service, transportation, social, and cultural infrastructures must be prioritized in future planning efforts. This will lay the groundwork for improving the quality of life for the elderly and achieving spatial justice in this region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Isfahan
  • Age-friendly city
  • Urban space
  • Quality of life

مراجع

Adib Roshan F, Talebpour M, Peymanizad H, Purazat A A. (2020).  Identify the Characteristics of the Elderly-Friendly City in Iran 2050. JFCV 2020; 1 (2):51-61.URL: http://jvfc.ir/article-1-43-fa.html. [In Persian].
Agresta, F., Bergamini, C., Podda, M., Campanile, F. C., Anania, G., Volpato, S., Nobili, A., Costa, G., Puzziello, A., Corcione, F., & Melotti, G. (2021). How to Define an Elderly and Frail Patient. 3–18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79990-8_1
alalhesabi, M. and Rafiee, F. (2013). Evaluation of the Requirements in Public Space for Elderly: A Case Study in Kholdebarin Park, Shiraz, Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(9), 247-257. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_33257.html?lang=en. [In Persian].
Alcañiz M, Solé-Auró A. (2018). Feeling good in old age: factors explaining health-related quality of life. Health and quality of life outcomes. 16:1-9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0877-z.
Appleyard, D. (1976). Planning a pluralistic city. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Barati, N., & Kakavand, E. (2013). Comparative evaluation of the environmental quality of residential place with an emphasis on citizens' image (case study: Qazvin city). Memari-Va-Shahrsazi (Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba), 18 (3), 25–32. https://sid.ir/paper/154327/en. [In Persian].
Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. Routledge.
Bokolo, A. Jnr. (2023). Inclusive and safe mobility needs of senior citizens: Implications for age-friendly cities and communities. Urban Science, 7(4), 103.https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7040103
Bosia, D., Zhang, Y., Thiebat, F., & Savio, L. (2017). Age-friendly cities: spazio pubblico e spazio privato. TECHNE: Journal of Technology for Architecture & Environment, 14.‏
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457.
Buffer, R., et al. (2012). Environmental factors in age-friendly cities and quality of life of the elderly. [Research report]. Netherlands Institute for Urban Studies.
Byun J, Jung D. (2016).  The influence of daily stress and resilience on successful ageing. International Nursing. 63(3):482- 9. DOI:10.1111/inr.12297
Calvo, E., & Williamson, J. B. (2008). Old-age pension reform and modernization pathways: Lessons for China from Latin America. Journal of Aging studies, 22(1), 74-87.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2007.02.004.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3
Chen, J., Wang, X., & Xu, Z. (2023). Sarcopenia and chronic pain in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pain Research, 16, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S435866.
Colnar, S., Dimovski, V., & Bogataj, D. (2021). Review of telecare in smart age-friendly cities. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(13), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.541.
Emily A. Greenfield & Tine Buffel (2022). Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Research to Strengthen Policy and Practice, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 34:2, 161-174, DOI:  10.1080/08959420.2022.2049573.
Estebsari F, RahimiKhalifeh Kandi Z, Estebsari K, Mostafaei D. (2020). Elderly Friendly City Concepts and Indicators. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot; 8 (1) :5-9. http://journal.ihepsa.ir/article-1-1281-fa.html [In Persian].
Evans, S., (2009). Community and Ageing: Maintaining Quality of Life in Housing with Care Settings. Bristol, Policy Press.
Deputy of Maps and Spatial Information, Isfahan Provincial Management and Planning Organization (2016), General Population and Housing Census (2016), retrieved from http://www.amar.org. [In Persian].
Fowler C, Gasiorek J, Giles H. (2015). The role of communication in aging well: Introducing the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Monographs. 2015; 82(4):431-57. DOI:10.1080/03637751.2015.1024701.
Garon S, Paris M, Beaulieu M, Veil A, Laliberté A. Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada.Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 2014; 26(1- 2) , 73-87. DOI:10.1080/08959420.2014.854583.
Ghasemieshkaftaki, M., Dupre, K., & Fernando, R. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of Applied Methods for Assessing the Effects of Public Open Spaces on Immigrants’ Place Attachment. Architecture, 3(2), 270–293. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3020016.
Ghența, M., Matei, A., Mladen-Macovei, L., &Bobârnat, E.-S. (2022). Factors associated with the participation of older adults in cultural and sports activities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106244.
Gholami, M., Amininejad, G., & Bonari, K. (2022). Measuring and evaluating the indicators of an elderly friendly city (Case study: Borazjan city). Journal of Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 2(5), 17–30. https://sid.ir/paper/1022262/en. [In Persian].
Halawani, R. (2024). The Effects of Public Spaces on People’s Experiences and Satisfaction in Taif City: A Cross-Sectional Study. Land, 13(9), 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091529
Hall, E. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. In Garden City. NY: Doubleday.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
Iranshahi, A., & Ghalehnoee, M. (2017). An evaluation of urban spaces conformity with the indicators of age-friendly city (case study: Chahar Bagh-e Abbasi Street of Isfahan). Hoviate Shahr, 11(30), 69–82. https://sid.ir/paper/154535/en. [In Persian].
isalou, S., j, M. and kh, A. (2015). The Needs and Problems of the Elderly in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Central Qom. Journal of Social Work Research, 2(6), 1-41. doi: 10.22054/rjsw.2015.7891[In Persian].
Joost van Hoof, Jan K. Kazak, Jolanta M. Perek-Białas, and Sebastiaan T. M. Peek (2018). The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
kassani, A., menati, R., menati, V., shoja, M. and mirbalouch, A. (2014). Investigation of the Effective Factors in Social Capital and Its Relationship with Quality of Life in Elders of Ilam, Iran. Sadra Medical Journal, 2(3), 235-244. https://smsj.sums.ac.ir/article_44028.html?lang=en. [In Persian].
 
Keijzer, C., Bauwelinck, M., &Dadvand, P. (2020). Long-term exposure to residential green space and healthy ageing: A systematic review. Current Environmental Health Reports, 7(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00274.
khazaee, M. , Amani,M. and Davarpanah,M. (2018). Analysis of age-friendly city in Iran. Geography and Human Relationships, 1(3), 876-890. doi 20.1001.1.26453851.1397.1.3.51.6. [In Persian].
Khoddam, H., Dehghan, M., Sohrabi, A., & Modanloo, M. (2020). The age–friendly cities characteristics from the viewpoint of elderly. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(11), 5745–5751. https://doi.org/10.4103/JFMPC.JFMPC_1098_20.
Kim, Y., Byon, Y. J., & Yeo, H. (2018). Correction: Enhancing healthcare accessibility measurements using GIS: A case study in Seoul, Korea. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0194849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194849.
Lee PL, Lan W, Yen TW. (2011).  Aging Successfully: A Four-Factor Model. Educational Gerontology. 37(3):210-27. DOI:10.108 0/03601277.2010.487759.
Li, J., Dang, A., & Song, Y. (2022). Defining the ideal public space: A perspective from the publicness. Journal of Urban Management, 11(4), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jum.2022.08.005
Liougas, M. P., Fortino, A., Brozowski, K., & McMurray, J. (2025). Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 15(1), e088439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088439.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Low, S., & Smart, A. (2019). Thoughts about public space during covid-19 pandemic. City and Society, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12260
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge. Massachusetts: The M.I.T press.
Manafifar F Z, Ghaffari F, Faramarzi M, Shamsalinia A. (2023).  Healthy aging and its prediction based on individual, psychological and social factors in elderly people of Amol city. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 10 (4) :321-334. http://journal.ihepsa.ir/article-1-2015-fa.html. [In Persian].
Mahmoudzadeh, Hassan, Aghayari Hirtovakl and Hatami, Davud (2024). Evaluation of the status of the fourth region of Tabriz metropolis from the perspective of an age-friendly city, Quarterly Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, 28(88) 79-47. doi :10.22034/gp.2023.54153.3060. [In Persian].
Moghimi, N., Navid, & Momeni. (2019). Investigating and evaluating the efficiency of urban spaces in the needs of the elderly with emphasis on urban parks. New Perspectives in Human Geography, 2 (3), 397. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.66972251.1398.11.3.20.9[In Persian].
Mohammadpour, S., Hamidi, A., Yekta Lashkaryani, A. and Mortezapour Hendeh Khale, N. (2024). Feasibility of Realizing the Elderly-Friendly Neighborhood Approach (Case Study: Bāgherābād Neighborhood of the City of Rasht). Geographical Studies of Coastal Areas Journal, 5(4), 41-56. doi: 10.22124/gscaj.2025.26209.1279. [In Persian].
Mohammed, S., & Abaas, Z. R. (2024). Public Spaces in Healthy Urban Living Environments According to The Dimensions of Health Places and The Spatial Characteristics of Vital Environments. Maǧallaẗ Al-Handasaẗ, 31(1), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2025.01.12.
Nazmfar, H., Alavi, S., & Eshghi Chahar Borj, A. (2018). The assessment of security in urban public spaces (Case study: Tehran city parks). Spatial Planning (Modares Human Sciences), 22(2), 133–165. https://sid.ir/paper/171846/en. [In Persian].
Organization WH. (2007).  Global age-friendly cities: A guide: World Health Organization.
Ramos‐Vidal, I., & Domínguez de la Ossa, E. (2023). A systematic review to determine the role of public space and urban design on sense of community. International Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12472
Rashid, K., Mohamed, T., Azyze, S. N. A. E., & Ismail, H. (2022). Determining elderly-friendly features based on an age-friendly city approach: an empirical analysis on local perspective in taiping and ipoh, malaysia. 20. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i24.1212
Ravensbergen, L., Van Liefferinge, M., Jimenez, I., Zhang, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2022). Accessibility by public transport for older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Transport Geography, 103, 103408.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103408.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: SAGE Publishing Ltd.
Resideh, B., Marsoosi, N., Taleshi, M. and Moosa Kazemi, S. M. (2023). Analysis of Infrastructure Index of Elderly-Friendly City in Mashhad Metropolis. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 14(3), 1-16. doi: 10.30473/grup.2023.65521.2736 [In Persian].
Ressideh, B., Marsoosi, N., Taleshi, M. and Moosa Kazemi, S. M. (2023). The Application of the Elderly-Friendly City Approach in Urban Transportation Planning (Case Study: Mashhad Metropolis). Physical Social Planning, 10(3), 85-100. doi: 10.30473/psp.2023.64733.2617. [In Persian].
Richaud, L., Amin, A., (2020). Life amidst rubble: migrant mental health and the management of subjectivity in urban China. Publ. Cult. 32. 77–106 DOI:10.1215/08992363-7816305.
Ruza, J., Kim, J., Leung, I., Kam, C., & Ng, S. Y. M. (2015). Sustainable age-friendly cities: An evaluation framework and case study application on Palo Alto, California. Sustainable Cities and Society, 14, 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.013
Saadah, M. (2024). Transformational Leadership In Public Sector Innovation; Toward an Elderly-Friendly City. https://doi.org/10.31764/jiap.v11i2.21895
Saberifar, Rostam (2023). Evaluating the Results of Policies in the Field of Elderly-friendly Cities in Iranian Metropolises, Hoviate shahr, 17 (54), 93-106.https://www.magiran.com/paper/2619348/evaluating-the-results-of-policies-in-the-field-of elderly-friendly-cities-in-iranian-metropolises?lang=en. [In Persian].
Sammy I, Paul JF, Sammy I. (2018).  The global challenge of ageing population–Part I: Definitions, epidemiology and physiological changes. Caribbean Medical Journal. 2:14-22. https://doi.org/10.48107/CMJ.2018.11.004.
Sarason, I.G. and Sarason, B.R, (1985). Social support: theory Research and Applications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, MartinusNijhoff.
Sheikhi, H., & Rezaei, M. (2017). Evaluating environmental quality of walking- based urban spaces and social responding (case study: Ferdowsi Street of Ilam. 8(29), 83-98. doi: 20.1001.1.22285229.1396.8.29.5.9. [In Persian].
Shiau, T.-A., & Huang, W.-K. (2014). User perspective of age-friendly transportation: A case study of Taipei City. Transport Policy, 36, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.010
Shotton, L. (2003). The role of older people in our communities. Nursing Ethics, 10(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733003ne570oa
Song Ki-min, JeongJin-wook, Kim Young-woo(2022),A Study on Age-friendly City Environmental Factors and the Quality of Life of the Elderly: Focusing on Cases of Wonju, Korean Journal of Social Quality,6(1).35-57. https://doi.org/10.29398/KJSQ.2022.6.1.35
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). General Population and Housing Census 2016. Retrieved from http://www.amar.org. [In Persian].
Statistical Center of Iran. (2022). General Population and Housing Census, Retrieved from http://www.amar.org. [In Persian].
Statistical Center of Iran. (2023). General Population and Housing Census, Retrieved from http://www.amar.org. [In Persian].
Steels, S. (2015). Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review. Cities, 47, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004
Taghvaee, A. A., Maroofi, S., & Pahlavan, S. (2013). Evaluation of the effects of environmental quality on residents’ social relations: Aab-kooh sector in Mashhad city. Naqshejahan, 3(1), 43–54. https://sid.ir/paper/249073/en. [In Persian].
Van der Boor, C.F., Dowrick, C., White, R.G., (2020). ’Good life is first of all security, not to live in fear’: a qualitative exploration of female refugees’ quality of life in the United Kingdom. J. Ethnic Migrat. Stud. 48. 710–731. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1852074.
Verma, I., & Huttunen, H. (2015). Elderly-friendly neighborhoods: Case Lauttasaari. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 29(1–2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2015.989765.
Vitus, K., (2022). Forming the capacity to aspire: young refugees’ narratives of family migration and wellbeing. J. Youth Stud. 25. 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1886263.
Wang M.  Qi X. Li Z.  Li j. Dong S.  (2023). evaluation of the suitability of elderly care in prefecture-level cities in China based on GIS: Heliyon ,9. 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16539.
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Newyork: Project for Public Spaces.
Zabitian Elham, Taghvaei Ali Akbar. (2009). Indicators for Adapting Elderly-Friendly Urban Spaces Using a Participatory Approach Housing and Rural Environment 28 (128): 60-71.URL: http://jhre.ir/article-1-53-fa.html. [In Persian].
Younes, S. R., Marques, B., & McIntosh, J. (2024). Public spaces for older people: A review of the relationship between public space to quality of life. Sustainability, 16(11), 4583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114583.
Zanjari B., & Pakshir A. (2020). Investigating and analyzing the quality of urban public spaces with an emphasis on the concept of an elderly-friendly city (case example: the selected neighborhood of district one of Shiraz city). Ms.C. Thesis, Apadana Institute of Hiegher Education. [In Persian].
 
کاوش های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی
دوره 13، شماره 2
بهمن 1404
صفحه 167-200

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار