ارزیابی جایگاه کلانشهر اصفهان در مسیر جهانی‌شدن با بهره گیری از مدل ترکیبی AHP-SWOT

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیای سیاسی-آمایش سیاسی فضا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران

2 استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران

10.22034/grd.2026.24570.1695

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف اولویت‌بندی ابعاد و شاخص‌های جهانی‌شدن کلان‌شهر اصفهان و ارائه راهبردهای متناسب با آن انجام شده است. جهانی‌شدن به عنوان فرآیندی پیچیده، تأثیرات عمیقی بر ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی و کالبدی شهرها گذاشته و مفهوم «شهر جهانی» را به عنوان مرکز ثقل شبکه‌های بین‌المللی مطرح ساخته است. این تحقیق ب با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی و با استفاده از روش‌های کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی، تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP) و مدل SWOT با بهره‌گیری از نظرات جامعه آماری که شامل ۷۲ نفر از خبرگان و کارشناسان برنامه‌ریزی شهری و جغرافیای سیاسی در اصفهان بوده، به بررسی مؤلفه‌ها و شاخص‌های مؤثر بر جهانی‌شدن شهرها و ارزیابی وضعیت اصفهان پرداخته است. یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که از میان ۳۷ شاخص در قالب پنج بعد اصلی، بعد فرهنگی- اجتماعی با وزن ۳۲۷/۰ بالاترین اولویت را دارد و شاخص‌های «میراث فرهنگی ثبت جهانی یونسکو» (۰۵۹/۰)، «گردشگری بین‌المللی» (۰۵۱/۰) و «حضور شرکت‌های چندملیتی» (۰۴۶/۰) مهم‌ترین شاخص‌های جهانی‌شدن اصفهان هستند. میانگین وزنی وضعیت فعلی اصفهان ۴۶/۲ از ۵ (ضعیف رو به متوسط) بوده و موقعیت‌یابی استراتژیک این شهر، در ربع ST (رقابتی- تدافعی) قرار دارد. بر این اساس راهبردهایی نظیر تقویت برند فرهنگی اصفهان در برابر رقبای منطقه‌ای، جلوگیری از مهاجرت نخبگان با ایجاد فرصت‌های شغلی در صنایع خلاق، و راه‌اندازی کمپین بین‌المللی نجات زاینده‌رود با استفاده از جایگاه یونسکو پیشنهاد می‌گردد.سرمایه فرهنگی- تاریخی اصفهان، محور اصلی جهانی‌شدن این شهر بوده، اما بدون اقدامات فوری در ابعاد زیرساختی، زیست‌محیطی و مدیریت تهدید فرار مغزها نمی‌تواند به تنهایی جایگاه اصفهان را در میان شهرهای جهانی ارتقا بخشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Position of Isfahan Metropolis in the Globalization Process: A Combined AHP-SWOT Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Zohrabi 1
  • Mahmoud sazegari ardakani 2
  • Saeedeh Moayedfar 3
1 MA Student in Political Geography - Political Spatial Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran
چکیده [English]

1. Introduction

Globalization has profoundly influenced cities, with certain cities emerging as "global cities"—strategic hubs for decision-making, innovation, and international exchange (Aghaei et al., 2013; Rafieian & Farjam, 2011). According to Friedman (1986) and Sassen (2001), global cities function as command centers and specialized service producers, while Taylor (2004) emphasizes inter-city connections. Globalization also presents challenges requiring strategic planning (Shams et al., 2015).

Among 215 candidate global cities, Iranian metropolises lag behind; Tehran fell to 108th globally in 2020 (Kazemi & Mohammadi, 2022). Geopolitical factors such as sanctions and regional tensions have reduced foreign investment and increased inequality. Isfahan, the cultural capital of the Islamic world, holds significant potential to become a global cultural and tourism hub, yet geopolitical and economic challenges hinder its development (Zali & Ashrafi, 2013). Despite these obstacles, globalization remains strategically important for attracting investment, boosting local economies, and strengthening cultural identity (Alderson, 2006; Rahnama, 2007).

This research develops a framework to help local decision-makers position Isfahan as a global city. The study addresses: (1) the concept and dimensions of global cities; (2) key indicators affecting urban globalization; (3) Isfahan's current status; and (4) priority components for its globalization process.

2. Research Methodology

This applied, descriptive-analytical study employed a mixed-method approach. Library research and systematic literature review were used to extract globalization indicators, while questionnaires and multi-criteria decision-making methods were applied for prioritization. The study focused on Isfahan metropolitan area during 2024–2025.

The statistical population consisted of 85 experts in urban planning, political geography, and metropolitan development in Isfahan. Using census sampling, 72 individuals (85%) participated. Data were collected via a researcher-developed questionnaire, whose content validity (CVR > 0.99) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87) were confirmed.

Data analysis included descriptive statistics (SPSS) and inferential analysis using AHP to prioritize components (all consistency ratios < 0.1). SWOT analysis was also employed to identify internal and external factors, and integrated AHP-SWOT results determined prioritized strategies.

3. Results and discussion

This study aimed to formulate a strategic planning framework to enhance Isfahan's position as a global city. The findings demonstrated that among the five main dimensions of globalization, the socio-cultural dimension—particularly UNESCO-registered cultural heritage and international tourism—holds the highest priority, reflecting Isfahan's comparative advantage as the cultural capital of the Islamic world. However, the Importance-Performance Analysis revealed that the most critical gaps requiring urgent intervention lie not in the socio-cultural dimension but in the infrastructural-technological, environmental, and political-administrative dimensions. Indicators such as the international airport, smart city infrastructure, air quality, and climate resilience exhibit notably weak performance relative to their importance.

The strategic positioning of Isfahan in the ST (Competitive-Defensive) quadrant of the SWOT matrix indicates that while internal strengths (such as rich cultural heritage and historical urban fabric) outweigh internal weaknesses, external threats (including the exodus of elites, regional competition, geopolitical tensions, and water scarcity) dominate available opportunities. This configuration necessitates a strategy that leverages strengths to mitigate threats—a diversification approach rather than an aggressive growth strategy.

Accordingly, the proposed strategic framework prioritizes the following actions: (1) strengthening Isfahan's cultural brand to differentiate it from regional competitors; (2) preventing elite migration by creating employment opportunities in creative and cultural industries; (3) launching an international campaign to revive the Zayandeh-Rud River, utilizing UNESCO's status as a leverage point; (4) upgrading international airport infrastructure and accelerating smart city initiatives; and (5) enhancing urban diplomacy and attracting foreign direct investment through targeted incentives.

Crucially, Isfahan's cultural-historical capital serves as the main driver of its globalization potential. However, this capital alone cannot elevate Isfahan among global cities without immediate and coordinated action in infrastructure, environmental management, and addressing the threat of brain drain. The study concludes that a balanced, multi-dimensional strategy—one that simultaneously capitalizes on cultural assets while urgently addressing infrastructural and environmental bottlenecks—is essential for Isfahan's successful integration into global city networks.

Future research should focus on comparative studies with other emerging global cities in the Global South, empirical investigations into the effectiveness of proposed strategies, and scenario-based modeling of Isfahan's globalization trajectories under varying geopolitical conditions.

4. Conclusion

This study developed a strategic planning framework to enhance Isfahan's position as a global city. The findings revealed that the socio-cultural dimension, particularly UNESCO-registered heritage and international tourism, holds the highest priority. However, the most critical gaps are in infrastructural, environmental, and political-administrative dimensions. Isfahan's strategic position in the ST (Competitive-Defensive) quadrant indicates that while internal strengths outweigh weaknesses, external threats dominate opportunities. Therefore, a diversification strategy leveraging cultural assets to mitigate threats—such as elite migration, water scarcity, and regional competition—is essential. Cultural capital alone cannot elevate Isfahan without urgent action in infrastructure, environmental management, and brain drain prevention.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Strategic Planning
  • (AHP)
  • Globalization
  • Global City
  • Esfahan Metropolis
Acuto, M. (2013). Global cities, governance and diplomacy: The urban link. Routledge.
Aghaei, P., Pouraham, A., & Zarghami, S. (2013). The rate of Tehran integration into process of Globalization. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 1(4), 11-25. [In Persian]
Alderson, A. S. (2006). Globalization and the world city system. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
Amiri fahlyiani, M. R., Safaepour, M., and Sajadian, N. (2020). Analysis of the Globalization Impact on Social Ecology Formation of Iranian Cities: A Case Study on Ahvaz Metropolis. Strategic Studies of public policy10(36), 282-305. [In Persian]
Anholt, S. (2006). The Anholt - GMI city brands index: How the world sees the world’s cities. Place Branding, 2(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990042
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Barber, B. R. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. Yale University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G., and Taylor, P. J. (2000). World-city network: a new metageography? Annals of the Association of American Geographers.
Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity Press.
Borg, J. V. D. (2004). Tourism management and carrying capacity in heritage cities and sites.‏
Chahardowli, M., & Sajadzadeh, H. (2022). A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City. Land Use Policy, 114, 105993.‏‏
Clark, G. (2004). The city: A World History. Oxford University Press.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.
Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and Change.
GaWC (Globalization and World Cities Research Network). (2020). The world according to GaWC 2020: Classification of cities. Loughborough University. Retrieved from https://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/geography/gawc/world2020t.html
Ghourchi M, mousavian S S. (2021). The Role of Global Media in Connecting Places of Growth Pole to Spaces of Flow (Case study: Anzali Free Zone). JFCV 2021; 2(1):33-47. URL: http://jvfc.ir/article-1-89-fa.html. [In Persian]
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
Glaeser, E. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Penguin Press.
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.
 Jahaninasab, A. (2017). The Role of Globalization in the Cultural Development of Iran. Research of Nations Monthly Journal, 3(27), 40-57. [In Persian]
Kazemi, H. and Mohammadi, J. (2022). Expression the Possible Scenarios of the Islamic Globalcity with a Futuristic Approach (Case Study: Isfahan). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement12(45), 129-156. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2022.41782.3007. [In Persian]
Kiarie, E. (2024). Cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1-14.‏
Landry, C. (2012). The creative city: Compelling and contentious. In Cities, Cultural Policy and Governance (pp. 122–130). SAGE Publications Inc.
Mercer. (2020). Quality of living city ranking. Mercer.
Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2015). The end of automobile dependence: How cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Island Press.
Ozer, S. (2020). Globalization and radicalization: A cross-national study of local embeddedness and reactions to cultural globalization in regard to violent extremism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 76, 26-36.‏
Pourmousavi, M., Ghourchi, M. and Rostami, G. (2011). Geopolitical Explanation of World Metropolises; Reflecting the Conceptual Differences between the Global City and World City. Geopolitics Quarterly7(21), 41-69. [In Persian]
Rafiyan, M. and Farjam, R. (2011). Globalization and its effect on world urban network structure. Geopolitics Quarterly7(22), 105-145. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17354331.1390.7.22.4.7. [In Persian]
Rahnama, M. R. (2007). Obstacles, problems and approaches of globalization in Iranian cities. Journal of Geography and Regional Development5(1), -. doi: 10.22067/geography. v5i8.4217. [In Persian]
Rahnama, M. R., Asadi, R. and Kharazmi, O. A. (2024). Analysis of the Challenges and Needs of Urban Diplomacy in Mashhad Metropolis. Geography and Urban Space Development12(2), 85-106. doi: 10.22067/jgusd.2024.43047.0. [In Persian]
Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.
Shams, M., Safari, R. A., and Ghasemi, A. (2015). Investing the Effects of Globalization on Physical Structure of Islamic Cities (Case Study: Isfahan Megalopolis). Regional Planning5 (17), 119-134. [In Persian]
Soleimani, M., hafeznia, M., ghorchi, M. and mohammadian, H. (2016). Explanation of the Relationship between Urban Infrastructures and Globalization of Metropolis Local Government. Research Political Geography Quarterly1(1), 55-81. doi: 10.22067/pg. v1i2.49565. [In Persian]
Tavana, M. (2020). 24-Hour Cities in Line with Globalization. National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology in Urban Life, Mashhad, Iran. Available at: https://civilica.com/doc/1134662. [In Persian]
Taylor, P. J. (2000). World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization. Political Geography.
Taylor, P. J. (2004). World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. Routledge.
Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. University of Chicago Press.
UCLG (United Cities and Local Governments). (2020). GOLD V Report: Towards the localization of the global agendas. https://uclg.org
UNCTAD. (2018). Creative Economy Outlook 2018: Trends in international trade in creative industries (2002–2015) and Country Profiles (2005–2014) (No. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2018/3). United Nations.
UN-Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Wong, M. E. (2021). Revisiting Jane Jacobs’s urban complexity in global sustainability city discourse. Architecture_MPS, 19(1).‏
World Health Organization. (2021). Advancing health emergency preparedness in cities and urban settings in COVID-19 and beyond: Report on a series of global technical working group meetings, February-April 2021. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/343394
Yousefi, N. (2016). The Position of Global Cities in the Regional Geopolitical System: A Case Study of Southeast Asia (Master's thesis). Supervisor: A. Bigeni. Department of Geography, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch. [In Persian]
Zali, N. and Ashrafi, S. (2013). An Investigation of Economic Globalization Role on Metropolitan's Sustainable Development, Journal Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 4(11), 1-16. magiran.com/p1183217. [In Persian]
Zhao, L., & Kim, E. (2025). Urban revitalization of world heritage cities through cultural and creative industries: A case study of Pingyao under the cities, culture, and creativity framework. Sustainability, 17(10), 4292.
Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Blackwell.