بررسی و تحلیل موانع مدیریت شهری مشارکت گرا در شهر بهبهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه جغرافیا برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

10.22034/grd.2025.22550.1642

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر باهدف بررسی و تحلیل موانع مدیریت شهری مشارکت‌گرا در شهر بهبهان تدوین شده است. این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر نوع و ماهیت، در زمره تحقیقات توصیفی- تحلیلی می‌باشد. گردآوری داده‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی و با ابزار پرسشنامه محقق ساخته صورت گرفته است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را کلیه افراد بالای 18 سال ساکن در شهر بهبهان تشکیل دادند که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران حجم نمونه 400 نفر در نظر گرفته شد و روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده بوده است. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از تکنیک‌های متعدد (آلفای کرونباخ، کندال بی، کندال سی، من ویتنی، اسپیرسون و اسپیرمن) انجام شد. یافته‌های پژوهش گویای این است که موانع مشارکت افراد در مدیریت شهری در بهبهان متعدد هستند که پاسخ‌دهندگان بیشترین درصد را به ترتیب برای عدم آگاهی و آموزش، قومیت‌گرایی و حفظ ساختار سنتی مدیریت دانستند و نگرش‌ها و عقاید ناپایدار و نفوذ حزبی نیز تأثیری با شدت کمتر نسبت به سه مؤلفه دیگر دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating and Analyzing the Obstacles to Participatory Urban Management in Behbahan City

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Goodarzi 1
  • Zahra Soltani 1
  • Mojtaba Danaie 2
1 Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 MA Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract



1. Introduction

Participatory management aims to fill the gaps caused by the shortcomings and mechanisms of traditional management by taking advantage of indicators such as accountability, justice, and a sense of ownership and lead today’s organization to the desired level of perfection. This management style is a crucial predictor for the emergence and development of the capabilities and dynamics of the organization, and many contemporary thinkers and classical theorists emphasized the importance of this issue. This type of participation lays the foundation for people’s mutual communication with urban management discussions. This beneficial and exciting experience in the administration of collective affairs stimulates the people’s desire to deal with more significant national works. It draws them to the large national contributions of the country by relying on the beneficial results they get from local participation. Therefore, in planning for participation, citizens’ informed and significance presence in different social, economic, welfare, and local fields should be one of city managers’ most important concerns and necessities.

2. Research Methodology

This applied study employed a descriptive-analytical research method. Data was collected using library and field research (a researcher-made questionnaire) techniques. The research population included all citizens over 18 years of age living in Behbahan City. Using Cochran’s formula, the sample size was determined to be 382 individuals. However, 400 participants were selected via a simple random sampling method to increase validity and reliability. Data were analyzed via statistical techniques (Cronbach’s alpha, Kendall’s tau-B, Kendall’s tau-C, Mann-Whitney, Pearson correlation, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients) in SPSS v.26.

3. Results and discussion

Pearson correlation coefficient determined the correlation coefficient between the two variables of lack of awareness and education and the degree of people’s participation in urban management in Behbahan to be 0.834, showing a strong and direct correlation between the two variables. With the increase in citizens’ education and awareness, their desire to participate in Behbahan urban management will also increase. Also, ethnicism is one of the obstacles to participatory management. The correlation coefficients obtained between the two variables, citizens’ ethnicity and non-participation, via Pearson correlation (0.821) and Spearman's rank coefficient of correlation (0.614) tests indicate a high and direct correlation between them, suggesting that in Behbahan, ethnicity is one of the most critical obstacles to citizens’ participation in urban management. Another obstacle to participatory management is adherence to the traditional management structure. The correlation coefficient between these two variables (traditional management structure and citizens’ participation in urban management) was also evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient, which shows a correlation coefficient of 0.768, indicating a strong and direct correlation between the two variables. It means that the desire to participate decreases with adherence to traditional management. Party influence is another category examined in this research as one of the barriers to participatory management of Behbahan City. It seems that the approach of city managers (except for the issue of elections) to participation is unfavorable. They do not want people’s participation because people’s lack of involvement in decision-making threatens the interests of self-interested managers (not all managers). By interfering in city councils’ decisions and electing mayors and other city managers for the party’s interests without considering meritocracy, partisanism causes a lack of trust and motivation for people’s participation in city management. According to the Pearson correlation coefficient, there is a significant relationship between the two variables of party influence and participatory management. Finally, there is a significant relationship between two other variables, i.e., unstable attitudes and opinions and the level of citizens’ participation in urban management. Finally, with another analysis, it was concluded that there is no relationship between people’s level of education and the desire to participate in urban management. The educated and sophisticated class of Behbahan City is unmotivated to participate in the management of their city. Among the reasons for this can be issues such as ethnicism, maintaining the traditional structure of management, not paying attention to the opinions of the young class, party influence, and the low awareness of the city managers regarding the abilities of this class.

4. Conclusion

Education, awareness-making, and correct information; motivation-creating and interest; trust-building between citizens and officials and strengthening of social trust; promotion of organizational culture; clarification and creation of play spaces for participation; and respect for all thoughts and attitudes of ethnicities and dialects without the slightest ethnic and party prejudices, all these general factors ad suggestions, can lead to the reduction of obstacles to participation and ultimately lead to the maximum increase in participation in urban management according to the local conditions and needs of the city.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • City management
  • Participation
  • Citizen
  • Behbahan city
Abbasi, R., Mousavi, S.M., Tohidian, Y., Shabani, I., Asadi, A.R (2019). Investigating participatory management with an emphasis on the system of acceptance and suggestions in Iran's administrative organization. Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 4(45), 193-213. [In Persian]
Abbot, C. (2020). Losing the local public participation and Legal expertise in planning law. Lagal studies, 40(2), 269-285.
Abdi Daneshpour, Z (2009). An introduction to planning theories with special emphasis on urban planning. Publications of Shahid Beheshti University, 291. [In Persian]
Abtahi, S. H., Shiani, M (2021). Acknowledging people's participation obstacles in Tehran's urban management: an analyses of qualitative content. Community Development (Rural and Urban), 12(2), 643-655. doi: 10.22059/jrd.2021.319833.668632[In Persian]
Alavi Tabar, A (2003). Participation in the administration of city affairs: Examining the pattern of citizens' participation in the administration of city affairs (international and Iranian experiences). Publisher: Organization of Municipalities of the country, second edition. 152. [In Persian]
Alipour, P., Zahedi, M.J., Shani, M (2009). Investigating the relationship between trust and social participation in Tehran. Iranian Sociological Association, 10(2), 109-135. [In Persian]
Alizadeh, K., Razavinejad, M., Radfar, M (2013). Investigating the role and participation of people in administrating urban affairs (A case study of zone 10 Mashhad). Urban Structure and Function Studies, 1(1), 61-87. [In Persian]
Alvarado Vazquez, S., Madureira, A. M., Ostermann, F. O., & Pfeffer, K. (2024). Social participation in planning, design, and management of public spaces: The case of Mexico. Planning Practice & Research, 39(4), 565-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2024.2315391
Alvarado Vazquez, S., Madureira, M., Ostermann, F., & Pfeffer, K. (2023) Challenges of public space management in Mexico, Cities, 146, pp. 104743. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104743 Angotti, T., & Irazábal, C. (2017) Planning Latin American Cities, Latin American Perspectives, 44 (2), pp. 4–17. doi:10.1177/0094582x16689556
Alwaer, H., & Cooper, L. (2020). Changing the focus: viewing design-led events within collaborative planning Sustainability (Switzerland). Sustainability, 12(8), 3365; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083365
Arango Cuartas, S., & López Valencia, A. P. (2021). Diseño Urbano Participativo del Espacio Público. Una herramienta de apropiación social, Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 31(3), pp. 13–26. doi:10.15446/bitacora.v31n3.86798  
Berkpour, N., Goharipour, H., Karimi, M (2010). Evaluation of the performance of municipalities based on the measurement of people's satisfaction with municipal services (case sample of districts 1 and 11 of Tehran). Two Quarterly Journals of Urban Management, 8(25), 203-218. [In Persian]
Biswas, R., Jana, A., Arya, K., & Ramamirtham, K. (2019). A good governance framework for Urban Management. Journal of urban management, 8(2), 225-236
Bronius, N., & Rigita, T. (2007). Public participation in City Governance Decision-Making Theoretical Approach. Engineering Economics, 54(4), 27-35
Cawthorne, J. (2010). Leading Form the middle of the Organization: An Examination of shared Leadership in Academic Libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2), 151-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.006
Chitrakar, R. M., Baker, D. C., & Guaralda, M. (2022). How accessible are neighbourhood open spaces? Control of public space and its management in contemporary cities, Cities, 131, pp. 103948. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103948 
Francisca, T.R., Joaquim, F.F., Esteves, A., Angel, T., & Yolanda, R. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the Participation of citizens and society. Journal of Technology in society, 70(2): 101978.  DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978
Ghaffari, Gh., Jamshidzadeh, I (2-11). Examining the obstacles, problems and solutions of people's development. Tehran: Society and Culture Publications, General Department of Social and Cultural Studies of the municipality. [In Persian]
Ghosh, S., Kumari, G., & Kumari, R. (2022). Assessing spatiotemporal dynamic of land surface temperature and satellite-derived indices for new town Development and Suburbanization planning. Urban Governance, 2(1), 144-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.ugi.2022.05.001.
Hafez Niya, M.R (2011). An introduction to research methods in humanities. Semit Publications, 7th edition. [In Persian]
Hafner Fink, M. (2012). Political participation, democratization and citizens Values in Europe. TEORIJA in praksalet, 49(3), 544-565.
Hall, P., & Tewdwr-jones, M. (2010). Urban and regional planning. (5 Th Ed) London: Routledge.
Hassanpour, A., Eskandari, M (2011). Examining the obstacles to the implementation of the proposal system in government organizations from the perspective of employees. Journal of Development and Transformation Management, 3(6), 31-38. [In Persian]
Jausus, N., & Said, H. (2014). Barries to participation in Neigh bourhood public Space Maintenance.Paper presented in the first international conference of IASUR (international Alliance for sustainable Urbanization and Regeneration) Kashiwa city, Chiba.
Khadem Al-Hosseini, A., Arefpour, S (2011). Participatory urban planning and the place of people in urban planning. Geographical Perspectives (Human Studies), 7(19), 108-123. [In Persian]
Kher Kaw, J., Lee, H., & Sameh, W. (2020). The Hidden Wealth of Cities Creating, Financing, and Managing Public Spaces, 1st ed. (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank). doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1449-5 
Knebel, N. M. P., & Fornasier, M. D. O. (2023). Social participation in urban planning as a human right. Revista Direito e Práxis, 14(3), 1686-1713. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/62903
Kribis, A. (2013). Political participation and none, democratic political Culture in Western Europe East – centera1 Europe and post yogos1ov 1oanheies. democracy in transition, 225-251.
Lyceet, M., Rassau, A., & Danson, j. (2004). Programme management: A critical review. International journal of project management, 22(4), 289-299.
Mahmoudi Pati, F., fallahzade, S (2018). Evaluating the urban participation barriers in Iran using Fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modeling. Scds., 7 (2) :119-145
URL: http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-594-fa.html. [In Persian]
Malekshahi, G., Nikpour, A., Gholami, S (2019). Understanding and Assessment of Factors Affecting Citizens’ Participation in Urban Management. Sociology of Social Institutions, 5(12), 327-350. doi: 10.22080/ssi.1970.2142. [In Persian]
Manuel, j., & Vigar, G. (2021). Enhancing citizen engagement in planning through participatory Film-making. Environment and planning B urban Analytics and city Sciense, 48(9). DOI: 10.1177/2399808320936280
Maranjanlou, I., Sadr Mousavi, M.S (2014). Pathology of people's participation in urban development and its effect on urban sustainability. Iranian Islamic National Architecture and Urban Planning Conference, Rasht, Payam Noor University, Gilan Province. [In Persian]
Møller, M. S., Olafsson, A. S., Vierikko, K., Sehested, K., Elands, B., Buijs, A., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2019). Participation through place-based e-tools: A valuable resource for urban green infrastructure governance?, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40(December 2017), pp. 245–253. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.003 
Nejati Hosseini, S.M (2001). Modern society of citizenship and participation. Urban Management Quarterly, 2(5), 6-15. [In Persian]
Nobari, N., Rahimi, M (2010). Good urban governance (an unquestionable necessity). Danesh Shahr, 11. [In Persian]
Noorian, F., Ariana, A (2011). Analysis of how the law supports public participation in urban regeneration (case study: Imam Ali Square (Atiq) Isfahan). Journal of Fine Arts - Architecture and Urbanism, 17(2), 15-27. [In Persian]
Páramo, P., Burbano, A., Jiménez-Domínguez, B., Barrios, V., Pasquali, C., Vivas, F., Moros, O., Alzate, M., Fayad, J. C. J., & Moyano, E. (2018). Habitability of public space in Latin American cities. Avances En Psicologia Latinoamericana, 36(2), pp. 345–362. doi:10.12804/revistas.uro sario.edu.co/apl/a.4874 
Pitelis, C. N., & Wagner, J. D. (2018). Startegic Shared Leadership and Organizatinal32 Dynamic Capabilities. The Leadership Quarter, 30(2), 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.002
Proli, S. (2011). Improving an urban sustainability environment through community participation: the case of Emilia-romagna region. 2011 International conference on green buildings and sustainable cities.
Rafiyan, S (2010). Examining the factors affecting citizens' participation in urban affairs and providing a suitable model (Fasa case study). Master's thesis, Research Institute of Geography and Biological Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchistan. [In Persian]
Ramnejad, A.M (2013). Examining the role of effective factors on the participatory management of Ahvaz city (a case study of the four-city region of Ahvaz). Master's thesis, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Earth Sciences and GIS, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, supervisor: Saeed Amanpour. [In Persian] 
Saeednia, A (2002). Urban Management, Green Book of Municipalities. Ministry of Interior, Center for Urban Planning Studies, Volume 1, 272. [In Persian]
Sharapour, M., Hojjati, H. (2017). Analysis of social factors affecting citizenship participation: empirical evaluation of social capital theory. Urban Sociological Studies Quarterly, 8(28). 1-32. [In Persian]
Sinnari, D., & Al-Nuaim, H. (2012). The Use of Mobile Technoology for citizen E-participation. International Conference no Networked Digital Technology Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 487-500
Swadi, A., Zeheidi, M (2014). Strategies to increase the role of citizens' participation in the development of metropolitan management. New researches in civil engineering, architecture and urban planning, 5 December 2014, Tehran, International Broadcast Conference Center. [In Persian]
Tahmasebizadeh, F (2022). Analysis of facilitators and limiting participation of citizens in neighborhood planning: case study of Isfahan city. Journal of Space and Place Studies, 1401(24), 95-115. doi: 10.22034/jspr.2022.702071[In Persian]
Tousi, M.A (1991). Participation in management and governance. Tehran, Public Management Education Center, first volume. [In Persian]
United Nations (2012). Key capabilities to improve local governance, concepts and strategies.
Wilson, A., & Tewdwr jones, M. (2020).lets draw and laik about urban change: Deploying Digital technology to encourage citizen participation in urban planning. Environment Planning B: urban Analytics and city science, 47(1), 1588-1604. DOI: 10.1177/2399808319831290
Yavar, B (2001). Participatory urban planning and the place of people's participation in the Iranian city, the realities of goals and strategies. Master's thesis, field of urban planning - urban and regional planning, Tehran University of Science and Technology. [In Persian]