نقش دولت در توانمندسازی جوامع روستایی موردمطالعه : ناحیه کاشان در ایران مرکزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیا و اکوتوریسم، دانشگاه کاشان،کاشان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه علوم جغرافیایی دانشگاه پیام نور وعضوقطب علمی توسعه پایدارمحیط جغرافیایی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

یکی از مهمترین اهداف تشکیل دولت ها فراهم ساختن رفاه و توسعه برای جامعه است. در ایران بخش عمده‌ای از مراحل توسعه روستایی در چهارچوب برنامه‌های پنج ساله صورت گرفته و سرمایه گذاری مهمترین ابزار دولت به منظور دستیابی به توسعه روستایی است. در این پژوهش با شناخت سرمایه گذاری‌های دولت در روستاها و نقش آن در توانمندسازی روستاییان، چگونگی اثرگذاری آنها در روستاهای ناحیه کاشان مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. روش پژوهش حاضر توصیفی – تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری 15255 خانوار روستایی ناحیه کاشان و حجم نمونه316 نفر تعیین شد. در این تحقیق با بهره گیری از روش طبقه بندی و بکارگیری ماتریس سه بعدی از شاخص های همچون میزان سرمایه گذاری دولتی(شاخص اثرگذار)، موقعیت جغرافیایی روستا و میزان جمعیت به عنوان شاخص های اثربخش تعیین روستاهای نمونه استفاده و در مجموع 12 روستا انتخاب شد. برای تبیین روابط میان متغیر مستقل و وابسته از تکنیک TOPSIS و تحلیل رگرسیونی و ضریب تعیین(R2) و از نرم افزاز SPSS و GIS استفاده شد. با توجه به رتبه بندی روستاها 75 درصد از روستاهای مورد مطالعه دارای توانمندسازی ضعیف و متوسط و همچنین 67 درصد از روستاها با سرمایه گذاری ضعیف و متوسط ارزیابی شدند. یافته‌ها از وجود رابطه قوی، مثبت و مستقیم بین دو متغیر سرمایه‌گذاری و توانمندسازی روستاییان(000/0P=) حکایت دارد. بدین ترتیب در برنامه‌های توسعه پایدار روستایی باید به برنامه ریزی مشارکت مدار و تسهیلگر، واقع گرا، پایین به بالا و غیرمتمرکز، انجام مطالعات آمایش منطقه‌ای و محلی، ارتقاء مسئولیت پذیری فردی در سطوح طراحی و اجرای برنامه توجه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of State in empowerment rural communities Case study: Kashan region in central Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • mahmoud ganjipour 1
  • mohsen shaterian 2
  • Mostafa Taleshi 3
1 payamnoor university. Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Geography and Ecotourism, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Payame Noor University and member of the Scientific Center for Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment of Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

One of the most important goals of forming states is to provide welfare and development for the society and the development process always involves the action of the state. Therefore, the nature of states, political and ideological philosophy and its structure play a key role in the development process, including rural development. Since the formation of the centralized state in Iran and after 1316, planning has started in its current form, and after 60 years, 12 programs have been prepared in the country, 11 of which have been implemented. During the years before the revolution, 6 programs were prepared and 5 programs were implemented. After the revolution, 6 programs were prepared and 5 programs were implemented, and the sixth program is being completed. In Iran, most of the stages of rural development have been done within the framework of five-year plans, and investment is the most important tool of the state to achieve rural development. Rural management approach until 1970, in most countries of the world, was influenced by the dominance of top-down development management policies and approaches, which followed the emergence of environmental challenges and socio-economic inequalities, the field of attention and change in bottom-up development approach. It has been provided since the 1980s in order to balance rural settlements. Therefore, in recent decades, empowerment has been proposed as a mechanism for rural development in Iran. But were the realities that took place in the country's rurals homogeneous with the demands and goals of the programs? In other words, considering the high volume of credits that are spent every year in rural settlements, the question can be raised that what does investing in rural settlements have to do with empowering the villagers? Has the agent of change been able to bring about the necessary changes and transformations in order to empower the villagers? In this study, by recognizing state investments in rural and its role in empowering villagers, how they affect the rurals of Kashan was analyzed.
The method of the present study is descriptive-analytical. The statistical population was 15255 rural households in Kashan district and the sample size was 316 people. In this research, using the classification method and using a three-dimensional matrix, indicators such as state investment (effective index), geographical location of the rural and population were considered as effective indicators for determining the sample rurals and Finally, 12 rurals were selected. In this article, SPSS software was used to assess the validity and reliability of the questionnaire, so that using KMO test, the validity of the rural household head questionnaire to measure the level of rural empowerment is equal to 0.867 and the validity of the rural household head questionnaire to measure investment The state is calculated to be 0.826. Also, based on the results of the structural validity test, Cronbach's alpha coefficient obtained from the rural household heads questionnaire to measure the level of rural empowerment is equal to 0.974 and the rural household heads questionnaire to measure state investment is equal to 0.846. In this way, the validity and reliability of the questionnaire is confirmed. To explain the relationships between independent and dependent variables, TOPSIS technique and regression analysis and coefficient of determination (R2) were used and for other spatial analysis, SPSS and GIS software were used.
The results show that according to the ranking of rurals, 75% of the studied rurals had poor and moderate empowerment. Also, 67% of the studied rurals were evaluated with poor and medium investment. Findings from field studies indicate a strong, positive and direct relationship between the two variables of investment and rural empowerment (P = 0.000). In other words, based on the coefficient of determination, 13.5% of the variance of rural empowerment is explained by state investment. As a result, through regression analysis, it can be acknowledged that with increasing state investment in the studied rurals, the rate of rural empowerment also increases.
Therefore, rural empowerment is studied as a new approach in the development of rural areas, with a systematic, integrated and combined view, so that self-determination, competence, impact, significance and trust emerge and organize as the driving force of empowerment in rural communities. In this way, the right to development and honorable life in rural areas can be realized objectively. In fact, due to their structural and functional nature, rurals are related to all factors of human life and the challenges ahead cannot be solved with a one-dimensional view. In the combined view, all factors are effective in empowering the villagers and the absence of one of the factors challenges the process of empowering rural communities. According to what has been said, the results of the article provide some strategic points: Lack of careful study and evaluation of developments in rural areas after the arrival of investments and on the other hand different perceptions of the concepts of capacity building and empowerment in practice has caused problems in rural society Stay tuned. Finally, in order to achieve the empowerment of local communities through the role of state in the developmentalist perspective, there are significant proposals that should be pursued through the state, realistic and targeted facilitation models. Thus, in sustainable rural development programs, participatory and facilitator planning, realistic, bottom-up and decentralized, conducting regional and local planning studies, deepening indigenous knowledge-based in rural issues, promoting individual responsibility at the design levels and Program implementation must be considered.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • empowerment
  • investment
  • state
  • rural
  • capacity building
  • Amir Ahmadi, H. (2002). Political Society, Civil Society and National Development, Naghsh and Negar Publications. (in Farsi)
  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Q.L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and Psychological Empowerment, Journal of Leadership &Organizational Studies, 22
  • Amundsen, S., &Martinsen, Q.L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and Psychological Empowerment, Journal of Leadership &Organizational Studies, 22
  • Aniah, Ph. Katherine, M. Ayemobilla, J. (2019). Smallholder farmers' livelihood adaptation to climate variability and ecological changes in the savanna agro ecological zone of Ghana. Heliyon, Volume 5, Issue 4, 145.
  • Assche, K.V., Duineveld, M. &Beunen, R. (2014).Power and contingency in Planning, Environment and Planning,46(10), 2385.
  • Azad Armaki, T. (2000). Modernization Thoughts in Iran, University of Tehran Press. (in Farsi)
  • Bleck, J. & Michelitch, K. (2018). Is women’s empowerment associated with political knowledge and opinions? Evidence from rural Mali, World Development, 106, 299.
  • Cumming, T.G. &Worly, C.G. (2014). Organization Development and Change, Cengage Learning.
  • Du Fumier, M. (1994) Les politiques agraires, translated by Gilda Iranloo, Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran. (in Farsi)
  • Dubosi, M. (1991). The Governance of the Third World: A Foucauldian Perspective on Power Relations in Development, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 16(1), 1.
  • Ebrahim Bay Salami, Gh. (2007). Government-Society Relations from a Sociological Perspective, Social Science Letters, 151, 175. (in Farsi)
  • Ejaz Ali Khan, R., Rehman, H. & Abrar-ul-Haq, M. (2015). Determinants of Rural Household Poverty: The Role of Household Socioeconomic Empowerment, American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 15 (1), 93.
  • Evans, p. (2001). Embedded autonomy states and industrial transformation, translated by Abbas Zandbaf and Abbas Mokhber, Tarh-e No Publications. (in Farsi)
  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T., (2015). Employee Empowerment and Job Satisfaction in the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy: A Self-Determination Theory 16 Perspective, the American Review of Public Administration July 1, 45(4), 375-401.
  • Ghorbani, M., Haj Alizadeh, A., Heydarvand, M. (2019). An Evaluation of the Impacts of Empowerment and the Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy on the Desire to Establish Sustainable Rural Businesses, Journal of rural Research, 10(3), pp. 441-451. (in Farsi)
  • Giampiccoli, A., &Mtapuri, O. (2012). Community-based tourism: An exploration of the concept (s) from a political perspective, Tourism Review International, 16(1), 29.
  • Haji-yoseffi, A. (1999). Relative Independence of State or Civil Society In The I.R.IRAN. , Journal of Strategic Studies Quarterly, 1(2). P 69-94. (in Farsi)
  • Healey, P. (2000). Planning theory and urban and regional dynamics: a comment on Yiftachel and Huxley, Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 917.
  • Jalaee Poor, H., Azad Armaki, T., Kalaantari, GH., & Baqaee Saraabi A. (2014). Evolution of State- Society Relations Types in the Process of Urban Development: From Dependency to Empowerment, Urban and rural management, 13(35), pp. 132-121. (in Farsi)
  • Katozian, H. (1990). The political economy of modernIran, despotism and pseudo-modernism, translated by Mohammad Reza Nafisi, Kambiz Azizi, Publishing, Tehran. (in Farsi)
  • Kohli, A. (2004). State-Directed development, Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambridge University Press.
  • Kumar, A. (2004). The Development State in History and in the Twentieth Century, Regency Publications.
  • Kumar, A. (2004). The Development State in History and in the Twentieth Century, Regency Publications.
  • Meier, G . (1994). From classical economics to development economics, translated by Gholam Reza Azad Armaki, published by Mitra. (in Farsi)
  • Michalek, J.&Zarnekow, N.(2012). Application of the Rural Development Index to Analysis of Rural Regions in Poland andSlovakia, Social Indicators Research,105و
  • Migdal, J.S. (1988). Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World, Princeton University Press.
  • Moseley, M. (2003). Rural Development, Sage, London.
  • Motavasseli, M. (1994). Privatization, Or, Best combination of the state and the market, Center for Business Research. (in Farsi)
  • Pourtaheri, M., Mohammadi, N., & Eftekhari A. (2014). The evaluation and assessment of deprivation level in rural areas Case: central part of Javanrood, Space Economics and Rural Development, 3(9), pp. 40-17. (in Farsi)
  • Rand, A. (2004). The Nature of government, center for civil society, P1
  • Razavi, N. (2011). The Call for Children’s Participation in Rural Empowerment and its Fundamentals, housing and rural environment, 133, pp. 28-29. (in Farsi)
  • Rifkin, S.B. (2003). A Framework Linking Community Empowerment and Health Equity: It is Matter of CHOICE, Journal of Health Population Nutrition, 21, 168.
  • Roknedin Eftekhari, A. & Heydari Sarban, V. (2017). Rural Empowerment (Funnamental Principles, Approaches, Theories and Experiences), Tarbiat Modares University Press. Tehran. (in Farsi)
  • Rossberger, R.J. Krause, D.E. (2014). Participative and Team-Oriented Leadership Styles, Countries’ Education Level, and National Innovation, Cross-Cultural Research, 49(1), 20.
  • Saeedi, A. & Darabi, H. (2006). The role of government construction investment in stabilizing the rural population, Geographical Research, 83, p.53. (in Farsi)
  • Sarai, H. (2003). An introduction to research sampling, samt, Tehran. (in Farsi)
  • Savari, M. & Eskandari damaneh, H. (2019). The role of participatory management in empowering local communities in coping with droughts in southern Kerman province, Journal space planning, 23(2), pp. 135-126. (in Farsi)
  • Shafiei Sabet, N & Mirvahedi, N. (2019). Investigating the Impact of Planning Approach on Empowering Villagers in Sustainable Rural Development (Case Study: Ray and Pakdasht County), Journal of Regional Planning, 9(33), pp. 104-87. (in Farsi)
  • Shafiei Sabet, N. & Mirvahedi, N. (2019) Pattern of Development Planning with an Emphasis on New Paradigms Case Study: Pakdasht and Rey counties Around Tehran Metropolitan, Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 1(2), pp. 67-53. (in Farsi)
  • Shafiei Sabet, N., Hosseini Hasil, P. & Rahbari, M. (2019). Mmanagement, Empowerment of Local Stakeholders and Physical Transformation of Rural Settlements(Case Study: Semnan Province), Housing and Rural Environmen,. 165, pp. 132-113. (in Farsi)
  • Shafiei Sabet, N., Rahbari, M. (2018). Rural Management, Rural Empowerment and Environmental Developments in Rural Settlements (Case Study: Semnan Province), 13th Congress of the Geographical Association of Iran, p. 726. (in Farsi)
  • Shakil Ahmad, M. & Abu Talib, N. (2014). Empowering local communities: decentralization, empowerment and community driven development, Empowering local communities, 8, 11.
  • Shakoori, A.(2005) Agricultural Development Policies in Iran, Samat Publications, Tehran. (in Farsi)
  • Shakoori,A. (2004). planning and Agricultural Development in Iran, critical Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.15, No.3, p242.
  • -Sharma, S, & Gupta, A. (2017). The Everyday lives and coping Strategies ofwomen in Delhi; Discerning roots of Psychological Empowerment-An Ethnographic Study, International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(2), 12.
  • Simard, M., Guimond, L. &Ve´zina, J. (2017). Neo-rural populations and their relations with local decision makers in rural Que´bec: collaboration or conflict", GeoJournal, Published online.
  • Statistics Center of Iran. (2016). General population and housing census of Aran and Bidgol counties. (in Farsi)
  • Statistics Center of Iran. (2016). General population and housing census of Kashan counties. (in Farsi)
  • Steel, M. (2010). Oxford Word power Dictionary, Oxford University Press. New York.
  • Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development, Sustainability, 6(9), 5512.
  • Waligo, V.M., Clarke, J., & Hawkins, R. (2013). Implementing sustainable tourism: A multistakeholder involvement management framework. Tourism management, 36, 342.
  • Woods, M. (2011). Rural Geography (Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring), translated by Mohammad Reza Rezvani and Samet Farhadi, University of Tehran Press. (in Farsi)
  • Yount, K. (2017). A framework for measuring women’s empowerment at multiple levels, Social Indicators Research, 128(3), 1171
  • Zasada, I., Häfner, K., Schaller, L., van Zanten, B. T., Lefebvre, M., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., &Zavalloni, M. (2017). A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: Literature review and European case study evidence. Geoforum, 82, 1.